Pulling the Plug on FHA Down Payment Assistance

July 23rd, 2008

FHA seller-funded downpayment assistance programs (wherein the seller of a property makes a donation to a non-profit, and then this same non-profit gives this money to the buyer for their down payment) have been on Death Watch for years.  HUD and FHA have tried to eliminate them at various points, only to be stopped by legal challenges from the assistance providers themselves.

Looks like these programs will finally be killed, as reported by the Washington Post:

The fate of these seller-funded down-payment-assistance programs has been in limbo for weeks. The Senate version of the housing bill would have banned them. The House version would not. Negotiators crafting a compromise bill have agreed to the Senate's position, which also is supported by the Bush administration.

"We're going to yield to the Senate on that," said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.)

The root of the problem with these programs is, and has always been simple: 

  • They default at a higher rate.
  • They have, at face value, been a legal end-run on FHA guidelines which requires borrowers to bring 3% of their own funds to the table. 
  • Also, in practice, the sellers aren't really paying anything, the sales price was simply inflated to cover the cost, and the buyers wind up with a larger loan.

Now, the use of these programs was perfectly OK, and many very good homebuyers used them to great advantage, so none of this should be taken as an indictment of a homeowner that used seller funded assistance to buy a home. (full disclosure, a handful of our personal clients used such programs over the years.  Mortgage bankers are not to judge, only approve or deny a loan based on the allowable programs and guidelines.)

BUT as is often the case, a program that may be good for an individual family, may be a disaster when writ large across the entire spectrum of FHA borrowers (who skew toward lower credit quality in the first place.) And speaking of disasters writ large:

...seller-funded down payments present the single biggest challenge to its solvency. Borrowers who take part in these arrangements go to foreclosure at nearly three times the rate of borrowers who put their own money down, according to the [FHA]

The FHA's solvency is at risk, and for them to execute their new role as the backstop for the home lending universe (a mission they did not ask for, but are going to get out of this credit crunch, sure as the world) these programs need to go away, and should have a long time ago. The taxpayers are the ultimate bagholders here.

No word yet on when the ban will take effect, but in all likelihood they will still be available for the balance of 2008.  More on this as it develops.

In the meantime, if you are an aspiring homeowner, start saving, because the last true Zero Down option is having it's epitaph chiseled. 

Posted in FHA, Financing Options, First Time Buyer, Uncategorized | No Comments »

FHA Mortgage Insurance Rates Now Risk Based

July 14th, 2008

Major changes go into affect on the FHA loan program on Monday July 14, 2008. These changes are very significant and will impact the affordability of these loans for many borrowers, especially those will less than stellar credit who can’t put 5% down. Basically, almost everybody in todays market.

Essentially, the Upfront Mortgage Insurance Premium (UFMIP)and monthly Mortgage Insurance IMI) will now be risk based. Even though the borrower has the option to pay UFMIP in cash upfront, it is typically financed into the loan. Bear in mind that UFMIP is not part of the regular closing costs. FHA has always charged a flat upfront mortgage insurance premium for every borrower regardless of credit risk. Until last week UFMIP on the 30 year fixed FHA loan was at 1.5%. The monthly mortgage insurance payment has also always been fixed at 0.5% for the 30 Year loan. These percentages will now change effective Monday.

UFMIP will now be charged on a risk basis, i.e., based on your credit score. It will range from 1.25% for lower-risk borrowers to 2.25% for riskier borrowers. In dollar terms this means that on a $200,000 loan UFMIP can range from $2,500 to $4,500. Remember this is on top of the closing costs and down payment already due. Since this can be financed into the loan, your final loan amount will reflect this cost. Having poor credit will now be expensive even on FHA loans.

Monthly mortgage insurance will vary from 0.5% and 0.55% and is determined by the loan to value. If you are putting less than 5% down than its set to 0.55% but if you’re putting more than 5% down it will be 0.5%. Monthly mortgage insurance is calculated by multiplying the percentage to the loan amount and dividing by twelve. So on a $200,000 loan and a MI rate of 0.55% your monthly mortgage insurance payment is $83.34.

First time home buyers who fall in the hefty 2.25% UFMIP bracket do have a way to obtain a slight reduction to UFMIP. If you are borrowing more than 95% of the purchase price (loan to value) and your credit score is below 559 then you may be eligible for a reduction in your UFMIP by 0.25% - so it would be 2.00%. However, you need to complete a HUD-approved pre-purchase counseling session. FHA will only provide the discount after you have successfully completed the course and will ask for a certificate of completion.

Additional Reading on FHA: Is the FHA Loan Program Right For Me?

Relevant FHA Down Payment Assistance related posts on other blogs:

Arizona Republic Article on DPA
Dear HUD, Stop Being a Bully
Real Estate Road Signs - “Buy A House for $500 Down”
Down Payment Assistance Programs

Copyright Notice: © 2007-2008 Shailesh Ghimire (Arizona Mortgage Guru). This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news

Share This

Posted in Credit Scores, FHA, Mortgage Insurance, Uncategorized, upfront mortgage insurance | No Comments »

Details of the $300,000,000,000.00 Mortgage Overhaul

June 26th, 2008

Okay most everyone knows what I think about this massive bailout package Congress is about to pass. In case you missed it, I think it’s a sham. Seriously. A big sham. How else do you explain this to the 30% of tax payers who are not homeowners. How about the 80%+ homeowners who pay their bills on time, buy what they can afford and read before they sign? Yeah. How about these tax payers.  Mr. and Mrs. Renter who lives within your means how about you pony up some dough so that we can clean up the mess our Wall Street pals and a few over excited folks made over there.

Okay.

Take a deep breath.

Aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh!

Now. Here are some of the details of the $300,000,000,000.00 mortgage rescue plan currently being “debated” in the Senate. From the Dallas Morning News:

They would receive a refundable tax credit of up to $8,000, or 10 percent of the home value, on purchases of unoccupied housing.

As part of a regulatory overhaul of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage finance giants, the bill would permanently increase to $625,000, from $417,000, the limit on loans they can purchase from lenders in expensive housing markets. That would make it easier for borrowers in those areas to obtain mortgages at discounted rates.

Later on in the same peice it says:

The Senate bill would provide $150 million to expand counseling for borrowers to prevent foreclosure and establish stricter lender disclosure rules to make plain the maximum monthly payment for an adjustable rate loan.

The bill also establishes an Affordable Housing Trust Fund, to be financed by $500 million to $900 million in fees from Fannie Mae and